Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix #755 - expose Implies[P,C] variation of Inference[P,C] #756

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fix #755 - expose Implies[P,C] variation of Inference[P,C] #756

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

erikerlandson
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #755. Implies[P, C] has essentially same semantic as Inference[P, C] except that instead of manifesting with a false conclusion, it will NOT manifest, and so it can be used effectively in chained implicit definitions.

@erikerlandson erikerlandson mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2020
Merged
@erikerlandson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Odd, the travis dash shows all tests as having passed but the GH summary is frozen

@erikerlandson erikerlandson mentioned this pull request Apr 9, 2020
Open
@erikerlandson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm going to close this, provisionally, and take a stab at a pull-req for macro-less ==>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RFE: A version of Inference[P, C] that fails for implicit chaining
1 participant
@erikerlandson