You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I think I've encountered a bug in the calculation of supporting read counts and VAFs for inversions (and probably other rearrangments?).
Inversions have 2 distinct breakpoints, and are supported by reads in both the +/+ and -/- orientations. The number of supporting variant reads VR in the final output is only the count of reads in the +/+ orientation, but the TR (the denominator in the VAF calculation) is the sum of the depths at both breakpoints, making the final VAF approximately 1/2 of the correct value.
Hi, I think I've encountered a bug in the calculation of supporting read counts and VAFs for inversions (and probably other rearrangments?).
Inversions have 2 distinct breakpoints, and are supported by reads in both the +/+ and -/- orientations. The number of supporting variant reads VR in the final output is only the count of reads in the +/+ orientation, but the TR (the denominator in the VAF calculation) is the sum of the depths at both breakpoints, making the final VAF approximately 1/2 of the correct value.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: