You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This comment on an earlier issue mentions the recommended way to perform formatting of nested/complex objects.
It mentions it's experimental at that point in time.
The documentation is no longer present in the API page of the docs. It was commented out in 97117cb "Migrate to mkdocs".
What's the status now? Is it's omission from the docs an oversight or is it no longer experimental but deprecated?
I was experimenting with it and noticed that some of the specifiers are applied to the constituents but some only to the complete value. I wasn't sure if that was intentional at first. It is in fact documented, but only in the (now commented out) section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RE: #2086 (comment)
This comment on an earlier issue mentions the recommended way to perform formatting of nested/complex objects.
It mentions it's experimental at that point in time.
The documentation is no longer present in the API page of the docs. It was commented out in 97117cb "Migrate to mkdocs".
What's the status now? Is it's omission from the docs an oversight or is it no longer experimental but deprecated?
I was experimenting with it and noticed that some of the specifiers are applied to the constituents but some only to the complete value. I wasn't sure if that was intentional at first. It is in fact documented, but only in the (now commented out) section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: