Proposal for Community Governance Scheme #945
Replies: 20 comments 8 replies
-
Lets make it 50% and the other 50% goes to token holders. 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
使用fil存储,解决垃圾数据问题 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I want to comment on just the 'Proposal' elements. I think a lot of these are great suggestions, and nearly all of these are things which are already in progress!
Voting is a REALLY hard thing to do well, but we're working on it! If you want to review the existing design spec for on-chain voting, you can do so HERE. We also host monthly Community Governance Calls and welcome engagement in the #fil-gov Slack channel! If you're interested in contributing to this work then we'd love to have your help! :) Right now, Filecoin Foundation is working with the StorSwift team to build a test implementation of on-chain voting. Least Authority is scheduled to perform both a cryptoeconomic and code audit of the test tool, all of which will be made public in the next few months.
Yes!! This is also something that we have proposed in our governance reform initiatives! I think this is a great suggestion.
In our current proposal, voting weight is calculated for the following categories: tokenholders (total token count), Core Developers (qualified contributions to core protocol development), Storage Providers (RBP), and clients (deal bytes). This is in an effort to prevent large exchanges or institutions (including Protocol Labs and Filecoin Foundation) from overwhelming community votes, as well as to reflect the varied ways in which community members contribute to building the Filecoin ecosystem. In this model, each 'category' of weight is capped at 25% of the overall outcome. However, individual wallet addresses can cast votes in multiple categories. This is a novel method that I have worked to develop and put forth several months ago, and I'd love any feedback that you may have. Ultimately, I am really excited about this proposal! I see a lot of SXX's suggestions in line with exactly the kinds of changes that many of us have been pushing for for several months! It is exciting to see community members care so much about the governance and development of this ecosystem :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
请官方能够多听取社区的声音,我们被币价折磨的非常难过,让fil回归社区治理吧,团队做好技术研发工作,带动fil币价重新起飞。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Support!!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Proposer
SXX Future Data from Asia Storage Provider Working Group
Background
The Filecoin network has reached a critical moment. Since November last year, the storage power (raw byte) of the whole network has been declining, and storage nodes (some with verified data) have been terminated. This threatens the network security and the security of humanity’s data. The progress of FEVM, IPC and retrieval are significantly slower than expected than the original economic timeline.
In 2024, we are seeing an upsurge of crypto assets value, and many new projects have landed on various exchanges around the world. Inscriptions, BRC20 and Ethereum 2.0 have been warmly discussed again. However, the price performance of Filecoin is stagnating which reflects it’s value, the morale of the community is low, year-on-year the survival rate of SP continues to drop, institutional investors withhold investment on Filecoin or give up, active Filecoin developers are reducing, and the relocation of various social attention away from Filecoin is now a trend. If Filecoin continues this way, the whole network will be dissolved soon.
Everyone in the Filecoin community has cherished the mission of Fielcoin and technological advancements in its early days, firmly believed in the power of technological progress, believed in Web3.0, and was determined to change the world with distributed storage. This situation is unbearable and hard to let go!
The re-emergence of Filecoin requires the joint efforts of both PL, FF and the community. PL and FF need to show a sense of responsibility and give the market more confidence; The community should also exert its strength, actively participate in the governance, and work together to promote the healthy and rapid development of the chain and its related technologies.
Proposal
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions