-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Community Review of QC Data Center Allocator #186
Comments
First Review DC granted to two clients on this round: The ongoing client was covered in the previous report. Nothing has worsened since then. The first thing that catches the eye of the new client is that one dataset was declared at 1.32 PiB. 8 replicas give about 10PiB, while the client asked for 5PiB. This dataset was stored several times before on the Filecoin network. Why was another copy needed? The allocator asked additional questions and asked for geographic information of one of the SPs. SPs list provided: SPs used for deals: The provided list of SPs includes 9 IDs, while the list of SPs used for deals includes 11 (the last two on the latter list weren’t listed originally). In general, the Allocator keeps asking questions when something seems off and runs CID Reports often. |
I'd like to know how I'm supposed to check the records for this.
I asked the client yesterday and he has explained accordingly But considering all the reasons for this new client, I will close this DataCap Application and stop distributing the remaining DCs
Since the previous week was China's National Day, I was away from work for about 10 days, so I'll pay attention to that later on |
@filecoin-watchdog Thank you for your review |
It might be done in several ways:
|
@filecoin-watchdog Got it,thanks |
In addition to the above tools, we also see allocators using this client database and searching for the client name. We understand this process is not ideal, and we would love to see some additional tools or proposals from the community for improvements. Additionally, checking this larger client as well as the other smaller client, and seeing some duplicate data issues with SPs. Despite these issues, we are generally seeing good compliance and diligence on this pathway. We are requesting that the allocator verify that they will uphold all aspects & requirements of their initial application, with some extra focus on these areas:
If so, we will request an additional 10PiB of DataCap from RKH, to allow this allocator to show increased diligence and alignment. |
Will follow up on these issues, thanks! |
DataCap has been refilled. |
Latest Compliance Report: https://compliance.allocator.tech/report/f03014608/1728349006/report.md
luhong123/QC-Data-center#3
luhong123/QC-Data-center#11
KYC exists
Retrievals look good for SP and distribution looks good
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: