We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be great to see the name of the stack for which the volume is presented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On the ImageJ mailing list, Hidenao Iwai wrote:
I can solve the issue#1 on GitHub (show stack name) Add two lines as follows in Volume_Viewer.java, public void run(String args) { ... imp = WindowManager.getCurrentImage(); String stackName = imp.getTitle(); // <--- added if (imp == null || !(imp.getStackSize() > 1)) { ... else { frame = new JFrame("Volume Viewer " + version + " (" + stackName + ")"); // <--- modified frame.setLocation(control.xloc,control.yloc); ...
I can solve the issue#1 on GitHub (show stack name) Add two lines as follows in Volume_Viewer.java,
public void run(String args) { ... imp = WindowManager.getCurrentImage(); String stackName = imp.getTitle(); // <--- added if (imp == null || !(imp.getStackSize() > 1)) { ... else { frame = new JFrame("Volume Viewer " + version + " (" + stackName + ")"); // <--- modified frame.setLocation(control.xloc,control.yloc); ...
@orena1 If you would care to file a PR, I would merge and release a new Volume Viewer.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Done -#4 Did not test, but looks reasonable. Thanks!!
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
It would be great to see the name of the stack for which the volume is presented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: