Question about intended license

[swinslow]

Hello @fge, I'm working with some other OSS projects that are looking at using some of your projects as dependencies.

Where it says that these repos are "licensed under both LGPLv3 and ASL 2.0", and in the LICENSE files that they are "dual-licensed," I've interpreted that as meaning that these repos can be used under either LGPLv3 or ASL 2.0.

Can you confirm that that's the intent here? I've received questions about whether it means that downstream projects have to use the code under both LGPLv3 and ASL 2.0, and I don't think that's your intent. Grateful if you can confirm though. Thank you!

[sharanpv]

Hi @fge , I have same question, It would be really Grateful if you can confirm. Thank you !