You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I am using the closed-loop trajectories generated by MPS SLAM service as ground truth for evaluating SLAM systems. The Project Aria paper reports a typical global RMSE translation error of ≤1.5 cm in room-scale scenarios. I would greatly appreciate any information you could share regarding the validation methodology used to establish the reported accuracy specifications
I understand that some details may be proprietary, and any information you can share would be invaluable.
Best regards,
Banafshe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I am using the closed-loop trajectories generated by MPS SLAM service as ground truth for evaluating SLAM systems. The Project Aria paper reports a typical global RMSE translation error of ≤1.5 cm in room-scale scenarios. I would greatly appreciate any information you could share regarding the validation methodology used to establish the reported accuracy specifications
I understand that some details may be proprietary, and any information you can share would be invaluable.
Best regards,
Banafshe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: