You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I know it's a long-lasting and controversial topic and probably not the highest priority for the team right now, but let me try to create the first simplified vision for a CSS implementation we all could agree on.
CSS-in-JS like React is on a dual mission, supporting both complex apps and small(ish) sites. This has created a big divide in the community because of the very different needs that these types of projects have. Like React, CSS-in-JS was born out of the need to reduce the complexity of maintaining large applications.
While there are many options for authoring CSS, it is super tiresome to convince a team to use a particular approach. It creates a big divide and lots of frustration. While there is a huge value in not having a built-in solution and giving the space to 3rd party libs to thrive and experiment, the friction and frustration for not having a good built-in approach that covers 90% of use cases is real.
Goals
High-performance static styles via CSSOM. Rendering CSS only once and reusing across components and updates allows avoiding additional work within components render cycle.
Lists - inline styles have no way to be reused across list elements, where typically styles are repeated.
Support the full CSS spec. Inline styles are limited to CSSStyleDeclaration and we need to support the full spec on the web.
Adhere to React's component model and the upcoming Suspense architecture
Non-goals
Enforcing CSS-in-JS over vanilla CSS or css-modules (you can still use className)
Replacing every possible interface/idea CSS-in-JS libs came up with
Composition [separate RFC]
Overrides [separate RFC]
Dynamic or state-based styling [separate RFC]
Theming [separate RFC]
Alternative object-based syntax [separate RFC]
Proposal
Tagged templates
familiar syntax
syntax highlighting
linting
ability to return a data structure that react can identify, not just a string
Since we can return from the tag function any data structure we want, we can identify styles created using our css function and we have no problem accepting both types of styles.
Using the style prop allows us to be flexible in the future about how React wants to optimize and treat this interface.
That being said using a new prop like css is also an option:
render(<buttoncss={buttonStyle}>x</button>)
Babel plugin
Babel plugin can be optional and can enable advanced features like:
vendor prefixing
optimizations
other preprocessing options e.g. using PostCSS
After babel plugin the call into css tag function can be removed and the result of the above example can be compiled to:
// libraryclassStyle{handleStyle(type='insert|update|delete',name='color',value='red'){// logic to insert styles in browser}}// author<buttonstyle={newStyle({color: 'red'})}></button>// in reactif('handleStyle'instyle){for(varnameinstyle){style.handleStyle(type,name,style[name])}}else{// normal react logic}
I know it's a long-lasting and controversial topic and probably not the highest priority for the team right now, but let me try to create the first simplified vision for a CSS implementation we all could agree on.
CSS-in-JS like React is on a dual mission, supporting both complex apps and small(ish) sites. This has created a big divide in the community because of the very different needs that these types of projects have. Like React, CSS-in-JS was born out of the need to reduce the complexity of maintaining large applications.
While there are many options for authoring CSS, it is super tiresome to convince a team to use a particular approach. It creates a big divide and lots of frustration. While there is a huge value in not having a built-in solution and giving the space to 3rd party libs to thrive and experiment, the friction and frustration for not having a good built-in approach that covers 90% of use cases is real.
Goals
Non-goals
Proposal
Tagged templates
Using style prop for both inline and CSSOM styles
Since we can return from the tag function any data structure we want, we can identify styles created using our
css
function and we have no problem accepting both types of styles.Using the
style
prop allows us to be flexible in the future about how React wants to optimize and treat this interface.That being said using a new prop like
css
is also an option:Babel plugin
Babel plugin can be optional and can enable advanced features like:
After babel plugin the call into
css
tag function can be removed and the result of the above example can be compiled to:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: