refactor: remove obsolete // +build tag

[wyrapeseed]

Overview

From Go 1.17, the preferred syntax for build constraints is //go:build,
which replaces the old // +build form. The old style is now considered
deprecated but still supported for backward compatibility.

This change removes the obsolete // +build xxx line, keeping only the
modern //go:build xxx directive.

More info: golang/go#41184 and https://go.dev/doc/go1.17#build-lines

Design Doc / Proposal：
https://go.dev/design/draft-gobuild

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @wyrapeseed, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors several Go script files by updating their build constraint syntax. It systematically removes the deprecated // +build directives, retaining only the modern //go:build format. This change improves code maintainability and ensures compatibility with current Go language standards, as the older syntax is considered obsolete since Go 1.17.

Highlights

• Deprecated Build Tag Removal: The pull request removes the obsolete // +build tags from several Go script files, aligning with modern Go practices.
• Modern Go Syntax Adoption: It ensures that only the preferred //go:build syntax, introduced in Go 1.17, is used for build constraints.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly removes the obsolete // +build tags from several Go script files. This change aligns with modern Go practices, as the // +build syntax has been deprecated since Go 1.17 in favor of //go:build. Given that the project's go.mod file specifies Go 1.24.6, this cleanup is appropriate and improves code maintainability by removing legacy syntax. The changes are correct and I have no further comments.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.26%. Comparing base (0dba4e7) to head (f50b73e).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2774   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.26%   61.26%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines        8589     8589           
=======================================
  Hits         5262     5262           
  Misses       2830     2830           
  Partials      497      497           

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	61.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.