Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overflow checking for multiplication #767

Closed
yzhang90 opened this issue Apr 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Overflow checking for multiplication #767

yzhang90 opened this issue Apr 9, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Bug that shouldn't change language semantics when fixed.

Comments

@yzhang90
Copy link

yzhang90 commented Apr 9, 2018

What's your issue about?

NOT in EVM is bitwise NOT, not logical NOT. So the overflow checking for multiplication (['assert', ['or', ['eq', ['sdiv', 'ans', 'l'], 'r'], ['not', 'l']]] ) is wrong. Consider the following the test cases:

def test_mul_overflow(t, assert_tx_failed, get_contract_with_gas_estimation, chain):
    mul_code = """

@public
def _num_mul(x: decimal, y: int128) -> decimal:
    return x * y

    """

    c = get_contract_with_gas_estimation(mul_code)

    t.s = chain
    NUM_1 = 85070591730234615865843651857942052864.0
    NUM_2 = 136112946768375385385349842973

    assert_tx_failed(lambda: c._num_mul(NUM_1, NUM_2))

NUM_1 * NUM_2 > 2**127, but no exception is thrown.

How can it be fixed?

Use ISZERO to test whether l is zero.

Cute Animal Picture

image

@jacqueswww jacqueswww added the bug Bug that shouldn't change language semantics when fixed. label Apr 9, 2018
jacqueswww added a commit to jacqueswww/vyper that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Bug that shouldn't change language semantics when fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants