Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 157 #737

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

Execution Layer Meeting 157 #737

timbeiko opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Mar 2, 2023

Meeting Info

Agenda

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assuming we'd like to move forward with scheduling mainnet, here are some potential slot/epoch/UTC combos:

192512 6160384 4/6/2023, 2:37:11 AM
194048 6209536 4/12/2023, 10:27:35 PM
195584 6258688 4/19/2023, 6:17:59 PM

@terencechain
Copy link
Contributor

If there's time, can @potuz and I briefly discuss: ethereum/execution-apis#388 ?

@jwasinger
Copy link

Time permitting, I would like to discuss EIP-6601 and EIP-6690.

EIP 6601 supersedes EIP-5843. EIP-6690 is a modified version of EIP-6601 which removes EOF as a dependency.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jwasinger added!

@snreynolds
Copy link

Since eip-1153 is on the agenda as a propsed EIP, I just wanted to give a concise update on it’s current state:

  • It has been implemented, tested, & merged in geth, nethermind, besu, and ethereumjs.
  • It has been partially implemented in erigon, with some minor work left and additional testing.
  • Tests have been merged in ethereum/tests and have been run against geth, nethermind, besu, and ethereumjs.
  • An implementation for inline assembly in solidity has been built and tested with some Uniswap related prototypes.

@rolfyone
Copy link

Assuming we'd like to move forward with scheduling mainnet, here are some potential slot/epoch/UTC combos:

192512 6160384 4/6/2023, 2:37:11 AM 194048 6209536 4/12/2023, 10:27:35 PM 195584 6258688 4/19/2023, 6:17:59 PM

The only concern I have is i'm not around on the 6th April, but if it works for everyone else the rest of the team can probably deal with anything that arises... Personally I'd love to see it go live and not just have to hope it worked :)

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor

If time permits, we'd like to share the Exploring Ethereum’s Client Ecosystem report based on the Client Diversity survey.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

closed in favor of #744

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants