Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 125 Agenda #401

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 125 Agenda #401

timbeiko opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Oct 18, 2021

Meeting Info

Agenda

@dankrad
Copy link

dankrad commented Oct 28, 2021

If anyone wants to read up for the verkle trie update, please read up here to get a summary for the suggested statelessness roadmap: https://notes.ethereum.org/Yn_mwNa2SeeQHnKsRgekKg

@adietrichs
Copy link
Member

If there is time, I would like to briefly discuss the base fee calculation EIP I just published: #406

@holiman
Copy link

holiman commented Oct 29, 2021

@adietrichs I saw a write-up a few weeks ago, I think written by Vitalik, where he proposed a basefee modification + explainer with concrete examples about how it would work with regards to transactions in the pool. I don't know if you know what write-up I'm talking about, but if you do -- do you know where it is? And is it about the same thing as you describe in that EIP?

@holiman
Copy link

holiman commented Oct 29, 2021

ArrowGlacier fork id: 0x20c327fc (please double-check)

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor

Other resources on Verkle Tries

@adietrichs
Copy link
Member

@adietrichs I saw a write-up a few weeks ago, I think written by Vitalik, where he proposed a basefee modification + explainer with concrete examples about how it would work with regards to transactions in the pool. I don't know if you know what write-up I'm talking about, but if you do -- do you know where it is? And is it about the same thing as you describe in that EIP?

I assume you might be thinking of the "Make EIP 1559 more like an AMM curve" proposal? Or maybe some similar proposal.

I'd argue those are orthogonal to this EIP: The EIP modifies the signal used for the base fee update (how full was the last block? how full should it have been?), whereas these proposals by Vitalik & co deal with how to update the base fee given a specific signal. I also have some thoughts on the latter, but decided to keep them out of the EIP to really make it single-purpose.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closed in favor of #407

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants