-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 125 Agenda #401
Comments
If anyone wants to read up for the verkle trie update, please read up here to get a summary for the suggested statelessness roadmap: https://notes.ethereum.org/Yn_mwNa2SeeQHnKsRgekKg |
If there is time, I would like to briefly discuss the base fee calculation EIP I just published: #406 |
@adietrichs I saw a write-up a few weeks ago, I think written by Vitalik, where he proposed a basefee modification + explainer with concrete examples about how it would work with regards to transactions in the pool. I don't know if you know what write-up I'm talking about, but if you do -- do you know where it is? And is it about the same thing as you describe in that EIP? |
ArrowGlacier fork id: |
Other resources on Verkle Tries
|
I assume you might be thinking of the "Make EIP 1559 more like an AMM curve" proposal? Or maybe some similar proposal. I'd argue those are orthogonal to this EIP: The EIP modifies the signal used for the base fee update (how full was the last block? how full should it have been?), whereas these proposals by Vitalik & co deal with how to update the base fee given a specific signal. I also have some thoughts on the latter, but decided to keep them out of the EIP to really make it single-purpose. |
Closed in favor of #407 |
Meeting Info
Agenda
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: