Skip to content

Conversation

@jtraglia
Copy link
Member

So whisk stands out in the _features directory. Other features use EIP names. I think whisk should too.

I didn't touch any of the field names or (non-fork) constants. That stuff doesn't really matter in my opinion.

PS: I plan on moving custody_game, das, and sharding to a new _stagnant directory later.

@jtraglia jtraglia requested a review from asn-d6 February 14, 2025 21:06
Copy link
Member

@dapplion dapplion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment on lines 180 to 181
WHISK_EPOCHS_PER_SHUFFLING_PHASE: 4
WHISK_PROPOSER_SELECTION_GAP: 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we might want to rename these to at least remove whisk?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I had the same thought. I would like to remove "WHISK" from these variables. In your opinion, would it be appropriate to do it in this PR or should I do this in a follow up PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're in it now, i'd probably just do it here...

Copy link
Contributor

@rolfyone rolfyone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM mostly, just wondering if we rename constants a little still...

Copy link
Contributor

@asn-d6 asn-d6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jtraglia jtraglia merged commit 45dfbe2 into ethereum:dev Feb 18, 2025
23 checks passed
@jtraglia jtraglia deleted the rename-whisk-to-eip7441 branch February 18, 2025 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants