libaptX is NOT open source

[AndroPlus-org]

A reverse-engineered library should not be called open source.
The original developer also says "compilation and redistribution in a binary format is forbidden!".
Please pay respect to the original developer.
https://github.com/Arkq/openaptx

[eremitein]

A reverse-engineered library should not be called open source.
The original developer also says "compilation and redistribution in a binary format is forbidden!".
Please pay respect to the original developer.
https://github.com/Arkq/openaptx

this is not my busy, in my builds used https://github.com/notmyst33d/libaptX and author called it "Open source replacement for proprietary Qualcomm aptX libraries on Android"

[AndroPlus-org]

In "Credits” section, there is the link to the original project.
notmyst33d only did setup for Android building and libaptx code is Arkq's.

[eremitein]

In "Credits” section, there is the link to the original project.
notmyst33d only did setup for Android building and libaptx code is Arkq's

again - not my busy, because notmyst33d pushed all project under MIT permissive license (and all files with code have proper copyright by Arkadiusz Bokowy, which code also under MIT), so i can using it in my GSI roms