You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The paper itself only describes n-of-n signing. We want at least t-of-n, and ideally a compartmentalized model (t-of-n or t' of k or something). The paper says (Section 1.2.8):
In this work we mainly focus on n-out-of-n multi-party signing, and do not explicitly consider the more general t-out-of-n threshold signing for t < n. Such a protocol can be derived almost immediately from our protocol herein for the online variant using Shamir secret-sharing, with relevant changes to the protocol’s components, similarly to Gennaro and Goldfeder [32].
We would want that extension to be as independent from the main scheme as possible; ideally, it should be decoupled enough to constitute its own crate.
ThresholdKeyShare and make_threshold_key_shares added in commit 3da84d6. This allows one to make threshold key shares in a centralized way and use them in the existing presigning and signing protocols.
The paper itself only describes
n-of-n
signing. We want at leastt-of-n
, and ideally a compartmentalized model (t-of-n or t' of k
or something). The paper says (Section 1.2.8):([32] is "Fast Multiparty Threshold ECDSA with Fast Trustless Setup", https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3243734.3243859)
We would want that extension to be as independent from the main scheme as possible; ideally, it should be decoupled enough to constitute its own crate.
Possible implementations to use as an example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: