You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd much prefer to be able to define the individual steps/sizes of the scale manually instead of having it generated based on a modular scale, which is something I simply don't believe in. (A part of my soul dies every time a designer talks about the golden ratio and visual harmony) – but more importantly, I've had negative experiences with rounding issues that were caused by using sizes that aren't rounded to whole pixels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Then again, does it really make sense for the scale to be bipolar when it's also used for spacing? It means that for smaller values, you basically have to go "up" negative numbers to increase spacing. It feels a bit weird, and I'd probably opt for separate scales for type and spacing, but it's just a first impression.
I'd much prefer to be able to define the individual steps/sizes of the scale manually instead of having it generated based on a modular scale, which is something I simply don't believe in. (A part of my soul dies every time a designer talks about the golden ratio and visual harmony) – but more importantly, I've had negative experiences with rounding issues that were caused by using sizes that aren't rounded to whole pixels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: