Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2017. It is now read-only.

should use a concept similar to the actions hash in ember proper. #12

Open
stefanpenner opened this issue Dec 4, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@stefanpenner
Copy link
Member

sending('destroy') should not destroy anything? Also collisions with general API methods should not be possible and Ember.States should play nice with the new actions and action hashes in ember proper.

@stefanpenner
Copy link
Member Author

bah, bit by this again...

@krisselden
Copy link
Contributor

@stefanpenner what about using Ember.Evented? do you prefer an actions hash? should it use events instead?

@stefanpenner
Copy link
Member Author

should it use events instead?

unsure.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants