Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[v2] t2t appropriateness for Classification and clustering #2118

Open
KennethEnevoldsen opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

[v2] t2t appropriateness for Classification and clustering #2118

KennethEnevoldsen opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers v2 Issues and PRs related to `v2` branch

Comments

@KennethEnevoldsen
Copy link
Contributor 

          I'm not sure that classification and clustering tasks should be considered t2t, as they don't fully fit the definition, but this is a minor

Originally posted by @Samoed in #2107 (comment)

I agree with this. Potentially, we could change these out for "t2c" (text to category/class)
@Samoed Samoed added the v2 Issues and PRs related to `v2` branch label Feb 20, 2025
@Samoed
Copy link
Collaborator

Samoed commented Feb 20, 2025

Also ImageClassification, ImageClustering and ImageMultilabelClassification

@isaac-chung
Copy link
Collaborator

t2c or i2c make sense (audio would be a2c). Originally, text classification was s2s. I feel t2c fits better.

@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Feb 21, 2025
@KennethEnevoldsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems like we agree on this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers v2 Issues and PRs related to `v2` branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@KennethEnevoldsen @Samoed @isaac-chung