You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been procrastinating in making the switch from alchemist.el for a few months now.
I realised that the main reason that I have not made the switch yet is because I don't want to manually download and manage elixir-ls binaries as is the current norm.
Another project that I have contributed to, Livebook supports multiple methods of installation, which includes, cloning from source, installing an escript from hex, or as a docker image.
While I don't expect a docker image, I do think that having a installation option via mix escript.install would very useful, and less tedious than manually cloning from source and building the binaries / downloading release binaries.
Thus I have 2 questions:
Is this possible with elixir-ls? Is there any reason why this hasn't already been done?
Would a PR for such functionality be accepted?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have been procrastinating in making the switch from
alchemist.el
for a few months now.I realised that the main reason that I have not made the switch yet is because I don't want to manually download and manage elixir-ls binaries as is the current norm.
Another project that I have contributed to, Livebook supports multiple methods of installation, which includes, cloning from source, installing an escript from hex, or as a docker image.
While I don't expect a docker image, I do think that having a installation option via
mix escript.install
would very useful, and less tedious than manually cloning from source and building the binaries / downloading release binaries.Thus I have 2 questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: