Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@elie222 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis update enhances the logging functionality by introducing a new exported Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller as Call Site
participant Logger as Logger Module
participant Formatter as formatMessage
Caller->>Logger: createScopedLogger(context)
Logger->>Logger: createLogger(optional fields)
Logger->>Formatter: formatMessage(fields, args)
Formatter-->>Logger: Formatted message
Logger-->>Caller: Logger instance with "with" method
sequenceDiagram
participant Service as Reply Tracker Service
participant Logger as Enhanced Logger
participant DB as Database/Label Service
Service->>Logger: Instantiate logger with context (email, userId, etc.)
alt Error encountered
Service->>Logger: Log error ("No thread messages found" / error reason)
else Tracker created
Service->>Logger: Log info ("Reply needed")
end
Service->>DB: Perform upsert/labeling operations with logging
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/web/utils/logger.ts (2)
20-42: Consider adding type safety for the fields object.The implementation looks good, but we could improve type safety for the fields object.
Consider this improvement:
- const createLogger = (fields: Record<string, unknown> = {}) => { + type LogFields = Record<string, string | number | boolean | null | undefined>; + const createLogger = (fields: LogFields = {}) => {This would prevent accidentally passing complex objects that might not serialize well.
44-59: Consider adding return type annotation for better type inference.The logger implementation looks good, but adding explicit return type would improve maintainability.
Consider adding return type:
- return { + type LoggerReturn = { + info: (message: string, ...args: unknown[]) => void; + error: (message: string, ...args: unknown[]) => void; + warn: (message: string, ...args: unknown[]) => void; + trace: (message: string, ...args: unknown[]) => void; + with: (newFields: LogFields) => LoggerReturn; + }; + return {apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/outbound.ts (2)
51-51: Consider adding error context for better debugging.While the error message is clear, adding more context would help with debugging.
- logger.error("No thread messages found"); + logger.error("No thread messages found", { enabled, hasLabels: !!awaitingReplyLabelId });
133-143: Consider consolidating error handling.The error handling for upsert and label operations is duplicated.
Consider consolidating the error handling:
- if (upsertResult.status === "rejected") { - logger.error("Failed to upsert reply tracker", { - error: upsertResult.reason, - }); - } - - if (labelResult.status === "rejected") { - logger.error("Failed to label reply tracker", { - error: labelResult.reason, - }); - } + const errors: Record<string, unknown> = {}; + if (upsertResult.status === "rejected") errors.upsert = upsertResult.reason; + if (labelResult.status === "rejected") errors.label = labelResult.reason; + if (Object.keys(errors).length > 0) { + logger.error("Failed to create reply tracker", { errors }); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/utils/logger.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/outbound.ts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/utils/logger.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Good practice exporting the logger type.Exporting the logger type allows for proper type checking when using the logger in other files.
64-82: Ensure consistent error handling between development and production environments.The Axiom logger implementation looks good, but there's a potential inconsistency in error handling between environments.
The
tracemethod only logs in non-production environments. Verify if this is intentional and if there should be any fallback behavior in production.✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other trace logging patterns in the codebase rg "trace.*production" --type tsLength of output: 34
Logging Behavior in Production is Intentional
After verifying the code and searching the codebase, it appears that the implementation of the
tracemethod—logging only in non-production environments—is intentional. No fallback behavior for production was found, and the rest of the logger methods (info, error, warn) function uniformly in all environments. Disabling trace logs in production is a common practice to reduce noise and performance overhead.apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/outbound.ts (1)
43-48: LGTM! Good use of structured logging context.The logger initialization with context fields provides good traceability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/inbound.ts (1)
67-92: Consider adding success logging for better observability.While error cases are well-logged, adding success logs would provide better visibility into the system's normal operation. This could help with monitoring and debugging by establishing a complete picture of the operation flow.
const [dbResult, removeLabelResult, newLabelResult] = await Promise.allSettled([dbPromise, removeLabelPromise, newLabelPromise]); const logger = createScopedLogger("reply-tracker/inbound").with({ userId, threadId, messageId, }); + if (dbResult.status === "fulfilled") { + logger.info("Successfully marked needs reply in database"); + } if (dbResult.status === "rejected") { logger.error("Failed to mark needs reply", { error: dbResult.reason, }); } + if (removeLabelResult.status === "fulfilled") { + logger.info("Successfully removed awaiting reply label"); + } if (removeLabelResult.status === "rejected") { logger.error("Failed to remove awaiting reply label", { error: removeLabelResult.reason, }); } + if (newLabelResult.status === "fulfilled") { + logger.info("Successfully added needs reply label"); + } if (newLabelResult.status === "rejected") { logger.error("Failed to label needs reply", { error: newLabelResult.reason, }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/inbound.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/outbound.ts(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/outbound.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/inbound.ts (1)
70-74: LGTM! Well-structured logging setup.The logger creation with scoped context is well-implemented. The inclusion of relevant tracking IDs (userId, threadId, messageId) will make debugging and monitoring more effective.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor