Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(appx): attempt to use identityName for manifest name #1941

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2017

Conversation

jviotti
Copy link
Member

@jviotti jviotti commented Aug 12, 2017

It is very useful to set a custom identityName when the name of the
app in package.json contains hyphens (which are not permitted in
appxmanifest.yml).

Even if you set a non-hyphenated name as identityName,
electron-builder will still use the package.json's name property for
the name appxmanifest.yml value.

Thus, we attempt to re-use identityName for that case as well.

Signed-off-by: Juan Cruz Viotti [email protected]

It is very useful to set a custom `identityName` when the name of the
app in package.json contains hyphens (which are not permitted in
`appxmanifest.yml`).

Even if you set a non-hyphenated name as `identityName`,
electron-builder will still use the package.json's `name` property for
the `name` appxmanifest.yml value.

Thus, we attempt to re-use `identityName` for that case as well.

Signed-off-by: Juan Cruz Viotti <[email protected]>
@mention-bot
Copy link

@jviotti, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @black-snow, @surajreddy and @MariaDima to be potential reviewers.

@develar
Copy link
Member

develar commented Aug 13, 2017

I see that you are right. Thanks.

@develar develar merged commit 0be983e into master Aug 13, 2017
@develar
Copy link
Member

develar commented Aug 14, 2017

Released as 19.22.1 Decided to not release as major release because appx is not default target and identity name is not required option.

@jviotti jviotti deleted the appx-application-name branch August 15, 2017 01:21
@jviotti
Copy link
Member Author

jviotti commented Aug 15, 2017

Sounds great to me, thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants