Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debian package repository cannot be mirrored by Aptly #531

Open
jstangroome opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Debian package repository cannot be mirrored by Aptly #531

jstangroome opened this issue Sep 29, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@jstangroome
Copy link

The Architectures: line in the Release file conflicts with the architectures of the available packages.

$ curl http://packages.elastic.co/logstashforwarder/debian/dists/stable/Release
Architectures: noarch
...
SHA1:
 da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709                0 Release
 5f6fcbd97954082f65caf5fd11802a558e8c7dc8              690 main/binary-all/Packages
 be5ae50d21ecd76e0779bb934a601897b434520c              476 main/binary-all/Packages.gz
 5f6fcbd97954082f65caf5fd11802a558e8c7dc8              690 main/binary-amd64/Packages
 be5ae50d21ecd76e0779bb934a601897b434520c              476 main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
 5f6fcbd97954082f65caf5fd11802a558e8c7dc8              690 main/binary-i386/Packages
 be5ae50d21ecd76e0779bb934a601897b434520c              476 main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
...

Subsequently Aptly tries to access the noarch Packages file but gets a 404. I suspect the Elastic Release file should specify Architectures: i386 amd64 or similar.

I will raise a similar issue with Aptly to cope with the existing format of the Release file.

@jstangroome
Copy link
Author

@ruflin
Copy link
Member

ruflin commented Sep 29, 2015

@tsg Does this affect us also in beats-packer? https://github.com/elastic/beats-packer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants