Skip to content

[Security Solution][Resolver]Enzyme test related events closing #74811

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2020
Merged

[Security Solution][Resolver]Enzyme test related events closing #74811

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 19 additions & 1 deletion x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/resolver/view/clickthrough.test.tsx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,10 +162,28 @@ describe('Resolver, when analyzing a tree that has two related events for the or
button.simulate('click');
}
});
it('should open the submenu', async () => {
it('should open the submenu and display exactly one option with the correct count', async () => {
await expect(
simulator.map(() => simulator.processNodeSubmenuItems().map((node) => node.text()))
).toYieldEqualTo(['2 registry']);
await expect(
Copy link
Contributor

@oatkiller oatkiller Aug 12, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The above expect already asserts that there is 1 item. is this extra expectation needed?

Copy link
Contributor

@oatkiller oatkiller Aug 12, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That being said, i think the change to the test name is a good one.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@bkimmel bkimmel Aug 12, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's a predicate to the one below (that expects 0). Just an extra check and maybe it helps a reader see more quickly (click once -> expect 1 -> click again -> expect 0)

simulator.map(() => simulator.processNodeSubmenuItems().length)
).toYieldEqualTo(1);
});
});
describe('and when the related events button is clicked again', () => {
beforeEach(async () => {
const button = await simulator.resolveWrapper(() =>
simulator.processNodeRelatedEventButton(entityIDs.origin)
);
if (button) {
button.simulate('click');
}
});
it('should close the submenu', async () => {
await expect(
simulator.map(() => simulator.processNodeSubmenuItems().length)
).toYieldEqualTo(0);
});
});
});
Expand Down