Skip to content

Conversation

@jimczi
Copy link
Contributor

@jimczi jimczi commented Apr 25, 2019

The subfields of the search_as_you_type are prefixed with the name of their root field.
However they should used the full path of the root field rather than just the name since
these fields can appear in a multi-fields definition or under an object field.
This field type is not released yet so this should be considered as a non-issue.

… path of the root field

The subfields of the search_as_you_type are prefixed with the name of their root field.
However they should used the full path of the root field rather than just the name since
these fields can appear in a multi-`fields` definition or under an object field.
Since this field type is not released yet, this should be considered as a non-issue.
@jimczi jimczi added >non-issue :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types v8.0.0 v7.2.0 labels Apr 25, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search

@jimczi
Copy link
Contributor Author

jimczi commented Apr 25, 2019

run elasticsearch-ci/1

Copy link
Contributor

@romseygeek romseygeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jimczi jimczi merged commit 501c2a7 into elastic:master Apr 26, 2019
@jimczi jimczi deleted the bug/search_as_you_type_multi_fields branch April 26, 2019 08:18
jimczi added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2019
… path of the root field (#41541)

The subfields of the search_as_you_type are prefixed with the name of their root field.
However they should used the full path of the root field rather than just the name since
these fields can appear in a multi-`fields` definition or under an object field.
Since this field type is not released yet, this should be considered as a non-issue.
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2019
…s-in-all-the-places

* elastic/master: (70 commits)
  Remove experimental label froms script_score query (elastic#41572)
  [Ml-Dataframe] Update URLs in Data frame client java doc (elastic#41539)
  Reenable bwc Tests in master (elastic#41540)
  Fix search_as_you_type's sub-fields to pick their names from the full path of the root field (elastic#41541)
  Remove search analyzers from DocumentFieldMappers (elastic#41484)
  Update community client and integration docs (elastic#41513)
  Remove Version.V_6_x_x constants use in security (elastic#41185)
  Mute testDriverConfigurationWithSSLInURL
  Remove dedicated SSL network write buffer (elastic#41283)
  Disable max score optimization for queries with unbounded max scores (elastic#41361)
  [DOCS] Explicitly set section IDs for Asciidoctor migration (elastic#41547)
  [ML] add multi node integ tests for data frames (elastic#41508)
  [Docs] Fix common word repetitions (elastic#39703)
  [DOCS] Note TESTRESPONSE can't be used immediately after TESTSETUP (elastic#41542)
  Update configuring-ldap-realm.asciidoc (elastic#40427)
  Fixed very small typo in date (elastic#41398)
  Refactor GeoHashUtils (elastic#40869)
  Make 0 as invalid value for `min_children` in `has_child` query (elastic#41347)
  field_caps: adapt bwc version after backport (elastic#41427)
  Remove Exists Check from S3 Repository Deletes (elastic#40931)
  ...
akhil10x5 pushed a commit to akhil10x5/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 2, 2019
… path of the root field (elastic#41541)

The subfields of the search_as_you_type are prefixed with the name of their root field.
However they should used the full path of the root field rather than just the name since
these fields can appear in a multi-`fields` definition or under an object field.
Since this field type is not released yet, this should be considered as a non-issue.
gurkankaymak pushed a commit to gurkankaymak/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 27, 2019
… path of the root field (elastic#41541)

The subfields of the search_as_you_type are prefixed with the name of their root field.
However they should used the full path of the root field rather than just the name since
these fields can appear in a multi-`fields` definition or under an object field.
Since this field type is not released yet, this should be considered as a non-issue.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

>non-issue :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types v7.2.0 v8.0.0-alpha1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants