Skip to content

Fix data stream lifecycle type, to correctly handle downsampling. #5593

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix data stream lifecycle type, to correctly handle downsampling. #5593

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+25 −104

Conversation

@gmarouli
Copy link
Contributor

Similar to #5583, the downsampling type in the data stream lifecycle does not reflect how the API is structured.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs.

API Status Request Response
cluster.get_component_template 🟢 → 🔴 14/14 14/14 → 10/14
cluster.put_component_template 🔴 34/38 → 32/38 38/38
indices.get_data_stream 🔴 125/125 77/125 → 76/125
indices.get_index_template 🟢 → 🔴 23/23 23/23 → 17/23
indices.put_index_template 🔴 142/166 → 131/166 166/166

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@gmarouli gmarouli requested a review from pquentin October 31, 2025 11:26
@gmarouli gmarouli mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2025
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pquentin pquentin Awaiting requested review from pquentin

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

backport 8.19 backport 9.1 backport 9.2 specification

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gmarouli @pquentin