You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Both server and client sides report error as below:
[W] [mux.go:42] mux:unknown conn type, only
[W] [mux.go:448] bad file descriptor
[W] [mux.go:448] bad file descriptor
[W] [mux.go:448] bad file descriptor
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
use kcp as transport
Server side
##bridge
bridge_type=kcp
Client side
[common]
conn_type=kcp
Expected behavior
no error msg
Screenshots or logs
[I] [client.go:66] Successful connection with server 1.2.3.4:567
[W] [mux.go:42] mux:unknown conn type, only tcp or kcp
[W] [mux.go:448] bad file descriptor
[W] [mux.go:448] bad file descriptor
[W] [mux.go:448] bad file descriptor
Server (please complete the following information):
OS: Debian
ARCH: amd64
Tunnel: kcp
Version: v0.25.4
Client (please complete the following information):
OS: Debian
ARCH: amd64
Tunnel: kcp
Version: v0.25.4
Additional context
tcp mode works fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thx
Kcp package seems like not provides a fd method xtaci/kcp-go#157
I tried to use unsafe.Pointer to convert kcp.UDPSession to net.UDPConn, wants to get fd, but fails.
So, I set a fixed value to fix this temporary, anyway, I will follow this issue, when it solved, I will update.
thx
Kcp package seems like not provides a fd method xtaci/kcp-go#157
I tried to use unsafe.Pointer to convert kcp.UDPSession to net.UDPConn, wants to get fd, but fails.
So, I set a fixed value to fix this temporary, anyway, I will follow this issue, when it solved, I will update.
Thank you for update, is tcp the only working transport at the moment or I can ignore and error and use kcp as transport?
thx
Kcp package seems like not provides a fd method xtaci/kcp-go#157
I tried to use unsafe.Pointer to convert kcp.UDPSession to net.UDPConn, wants to get fd, but fails.
So, I set a fixed value to fix this temporary, anyway, I will follow this issue, when it solved, I will update.
Thank you for update, is tcp the only working transport at the moment or I can ignore and error and use kcp as transport?
Using tcp for now, I will solve other problems and update later
Describe the bug
Both server and client sides report error as below:
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
no error msg
Screenshots or logs
Server (please complete the following information):
Client (please complete the following information):
Additional context
tcp mode works fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: