diff --git a/Directory.Build.props b/Directory.Build.props
index c5e11e54..16cb0241 100644
--- a/Directory.Build.props
+++ b/Directory.Build.props
@@ -13,6 +13,33 @@
     <EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>
     <!-- Temporarily ignore warnings from dotnet target framework being out of support. When I decide to stop supporting older frameworks I need to remove this setting. For more info see https://andrewlock.net/fixing-build-warning-netsdk1138-when-building-end-of-life-projects-with-dotnet-5/ -->
     <CheckEolTargetFramework>false</CheckEolTargetFramework>
+    <!--
+      GenerateDocumentationFile is something I wanted enabled for the projects under /src that produce the NuGet packages.
+      For tests I thought I didn't need this enabled but without it I won't get warnings about 'unused usings' (IDE0005)
+      when building with the dotnet CLI, I'll only get them when using Visual Studio or when running dotnet format.
+
+      For more info see:
+      - Compiler does not report unused imports when XML doc comments are disabled: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/41640
+      - And this comment for the first workaround presented: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/41640#issuecomment-985780130
+
+      NOTE:
+      1) Even if GenerateDocumentationFile is not required anymore to get IDE0005 to work via the dotnet CLI, I found that I might still
+      want to have GenerateDocumentationFile enabled even for my test projects. This is because I've chosen to use to add a summary documentation
+      tag to all my tests to explain what they do and by enabling GenerateDocumentationFile I "seem" get some extra checks on what I write on
+      those summary tags. For instance, on build I get warned if I have incorrect cref values.
+      When reviewing if I still need GenerateDocumentationFile for test projects I should test having an invalid cref and see if it I get
+      warnings on build.
+
+      2) Hopefully, when https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/41640 gets closed, I can tidy up this huge comment block
+
+      3) Some of the proposed fixes also add some exclusions to NoWarn like: <NoWarn>$(NoWarn);CS1573;CS1591;CS1712</NoWarn>
+      but I've found I didn't need them, yet at least.
+
+      CS1573: Parameter 'parameter' has no matching param tag in the XML comment for 'parameter' (but other parameters do)
+      CS1591: Missing XML comment for publicly visible type or member 'Type_or_Member'
+      CS1712: Type parameter 'type_parameter' has no matching typeparam tag in the XML comment on 'type_or_member' (but other type parameters do)
+    -->
+    <GenerateDocumentationFile>true</GenerateDocumentationFile>
   </PropertyGroup>
 
   <ItemGroup>
diff --git a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationHostTests.cs b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationHostTests.cs
index e1ac31e7..3b3a8dab 100644
--- a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationHostTests.cs
+++ b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationHostTests.cs
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ public class AddTestConfigurationHostTests
     /// <summary>
     /// Tests that <see cref="Host.CreateDefaultBuilder()"/> adds two <see cref="JsonConfigurationProvider"/>
     /// to the app configuration.
-    /// This test serves as a control test because all the tests use the <see cref="WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder()"/> as a way
+    /// This test serves as a control test because all the tests use the <see cref="Host.CreateDefaultBuilder()"/> as a way
     /// to setup a <see cref="IWebHost"/> with several <see cref="ConfigurationProvider"/> and at least two <see cref="JsonConfigurationProvider"/>.
     /// If this changes in the future then I could start having false positives on the other tests.
     /// </summary>
diff --git a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationWebHostTests.cs b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationWebHostTests.cs
index 43ac2463..8e9bdde6 100644
--- a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationWebHostTests.cs
+++ b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/Configuration/AddTestConfigurationWebHostTests.cs
@@ -3,10 +3,24 @@ namespace DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests.Configuration;
 [Trait("Category", XUnitCategories.Configuration)]
 public class AddTestConfigurationWebHostTests
 {
+    // On the below summary I'm not using a <see cref=""/> tag for WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder()
+    // because the static WebHost exists on both Microsoft.AspNetCore and Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting
+    // and I have both of then as global usings.
+    // Now in terms of code there's no clash and need to use full namespaces to disambiguate because
+    // the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.WebHost is internal and Microsoft.AspNetCore.WebHost is public,
+    // so it always picks the public one.
+    //
+    // HOWEVER, in code comments you can reference internal types so there's no way to know which one should
+    // be used without doing <see cref="Microsoft.AspNetCore.WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder()"/>.
+    // The problem occurs when I run dotnet format and it says that I should remove Microsoft.AspNetCore from the
+    // cref attribute because it sees it on the global usings.
+    //
+    // For now I'm working around this problem by NOT using cref for this case.
+
     /// <summary>
-    /// Tests that <see cref="WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder()"/> adds two <see cref="JsonConfigurationProvider"/>
+    /// Tests that WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder() adds two <see cref="JsonConfigurationProvider"/>
     /// to the app configuration.
-    /// This test serves as a control test because all the tests use the <see cref="WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder()"/> as a way
+    /// This test serves as a control test because all the tests use the WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder() as a way
     /// to setup a <see cref="IWebHost"/> with several <see cref="ConfigurationProvider"/> and at least two <see cref="JsonConfigurationProvider"/>.
     /// If this changes in the future then I could start having false positives on the other tests.
     /// </summary>
diff --git a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/HttpMessageHandlers/ResponseMocking/HttpResponseMessageMockBuilderTests.cs b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/HttpMessageHandlers/ResponseMocking/HttpResponseMessageMockBuilderTests.cs
index 3d743d5a..037f9e4f 100644
--- a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/HttpMessageHandlers/ResponseMocking/HttpResponseMessageMockBuilderTests.cs
+++ b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/HttpMessageHandlers/ResponseMocking/HttpResponseMessageMockBuilderTests.cs
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ public void Where2ValidateArguments()
     }
 
     /// <summary>
-    /// Validates the arguments for the <see cref="HttpResponseMessageMockBuilder.RespondWith(HttpResponseMessage)"/> method.
+    /// Validates the arguments for the <see cref="HttpResponseMessageMockBuilder.RespondWith(Func{HttpResponseMessage})"/> method.
     /// </summary>
     [Fact]
     public void Respond1WithValidateArguments()
diff --git a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/OutOfProcess/ResponseBasedHttpMockServerBuilderTests.cs b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/OutOfProcess/ResponseBasedHttpMockServerBuilderTests.cs
index 1e6ce8cc..56d6d49d 100644
--- a/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/OutOfProcess/ResponseBasedHttpMockServerBuilderTests.cs
+++ b/tests/DotNet.Sdk.Extensions.Testing.Tests/HttpMocking/OutOfProcess/ResponseBasedHttpMockServerBuilderTests.cs
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ public async Task RepliesAsConfigured2()
     /// In linux this test fails with error:
     /// System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException : The SSL connection could not be established, see inner exception.
     /// because dev certificate does not exist
-    /// For more info on how to resolve this issue see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/enforcing-ssl?view=aspnetcore-5.0&tabs=visual-studio#ssl-linux.
+    /// For more info on how to resolve this issue see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/enforcing-ssl#ssl-linux.
     /// </remarks>
     [Fact]
     public async Task RepliesAsConfigured()