Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for multiple apps via config #27

Open
arrowcircle opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #43
Open

Support for multiple apps via config #27

arrowcircle opened this issue Apr 29, 2015 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #43
Assignees

Comments

@arrowcircle
Copy link

Hi! It will be cool to have support of multiple pairs of apps/secrets/ids via config file.
Any ideas about making this feature?

@arrowcircle arrowcircle changed the title Support of multiple apps via config Support for multiple apps via config Apr 29, 2015
@edgurgel
Copy link
Owner

It should be fairly easy to add this feature. I will start working on it soon.

@edgurgel
Copy link
Owner

edgurgel commented May 2, 2015

TODO:

  • - Store id-key-secret so it can be checked for each request (Probably an ETS table instead of application env)
  • - Add the app_id to the gproc reg/send calls so it will affect just connections related to the specific app_id

@iarief
Copy link

iarief commented Sep 2, 2015

Hi @edgurgel , i was wondering if this is still being worked on or is it a dropped feature.
If it's not extemely complicated, i might help with this. although my knowledge in erlang is fairly small, i might be able to do something if you point me to the right direction.

@edgurgel
Copy link
Owner

edgurgel commented Sep 3, 2015

oh hey @funsterisdafunniest. I'm glad you asked cause I'm pretty close to finish this. I think I will have something ready during the weekend.

@edgurgel edgurgel self-assigned this Sep 3, 2015
@iarief
Copy link

iarief commented Sep 3, 2015

@edgurgel that's great! Thank you so much for creating this project! it really makes my life a lot easier than some of the other alternatives!

@edgurgel edgurgel linked a pull request Sep 6, 2015 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants