You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I'm interested in building an Arch Linux package for MOSAIC, as one already exist in the Arch User Repository (AUR) for sumo but not for MOSAIC (unless I am wrong).
Description
I have an issue closely related to this issue: eclipse-sumo#14228.
Unlike sumo, this repository haves release on GitHub, however, MOSAIC version 23.1 is not displayed in the "Release" tab while:
Hi, unfortunately I'm not too sure about the tarball requirements and if a MOSAIC bundle is suitable for this. If you could enlighten me a bit on how the package would be structured, I may could help better.
What would be the best practice?
To pull the source tarball from :
This site provides only the compiled MOSAIC bundle (jar files, a shell file which eventually calls java, configuration files in the etc directory, and various scenario-related files). There is no sources bundled here.
Contains the same BUNDLE as in 1., but additionally the sources from the associated tag.
Contains only the sources from the tag.
For me, Version 23.1 is displayed as a release in the repository homepage, but not on the "Release" tab, so the last question still holds.
Hi,
I'm interested in building an Arch Linux package for MOSAIC, as one already exist in the Arch User Repository (AUR) for sumo but not for MOSAIC (unless I am wrong).
Description
I have an issue closely related to this issue: eclipse-sumo#14228.
Unlike sumo, this repository haves release on GitHub, however, MOSAIC version 23.1 is not displayed in the "Release" tab while:
It looks like source tarball provided from the "Tags" tab and dcaiti.tu-berlin.de are the same for MOSAIC 23.1.
What would be the best practice?
To pull the source tarball from :
Best,
Edit: For me, Version 23.1 is displayed as a release in the repository homepage, but not on the "Release" tab, so the last question still holds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: