Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set the position of the stop line (minor link) #15442

Open
kasop1 opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Set the position of the stop line (minor link) #15442

kasop1 opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@kasop1
Copy link

kasop1 commented Sep 6, 2024

I know two ways to set stop lines (jmStoplineGap, stopOffset).
I want to use jmStoplineGap to set stop lines, but this can only be used for priority or TL junctions. I want to use jmStoplineGap to set the position of stop lines at other junctions, such as All Way stop.
Could you please improve this?

@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Sep 6, 2024

you can also configure this on the network level with endOffset (https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Networks/PlainXML.html#lane-specific_definitions) or do you need this per vehicleType?

@namdre namdre added the question label Sep 6, 2024
@namdre namdre self-assigned this Sep 6, 2024
@namdre namdre added the a:sumo label Sep 6, 2024
@kasop1
Copy link
Author

kasop1 commented Sep 6, 2024

Yes, I want to set it for each vtype.

@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Sep 6, 2024

jmStopLineGap is intended for situations where the vehicle can expect to drive with priority.
In all other cases, the driver is on a "minor" road and has to find a gap in foe traffic. The current model assumes that drivers will always drive up as far as possible in this situation to simplify finding a gap. A new model parameter should be introduced to make this configurable.

@namdre namdre changed the title Set the position of the stop line. Set the position of the stop line (minor link) Sep 6, 2024
@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Sep 6, 2024

Arguably, allway_stop could fall in the first group because the driver receives a window with full priority at some point and so doesn't have to worry about finding a gap.

@kasop1
Copy link
Author

kasop1 commented Sep 6, 2024

I look forward to the updates. Thank you so much for your efforts.

@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Sep 6, 2024

this won't work for allway_stop in the near future (#15449)

@behrisch behrisch added this to the backlog milestone Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants