-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feed the next streams update site repository with the contents of M1 / M2 / RC1 / RC2 prior to release #884
Comments
Technically the https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.27/ already exits (it is just quite empty) and is a composite repo, so one could think of having simply the following sub-directories:
The composite repo will then always only point to the most recent one (and finally to the release folder), that way one can either reference to a fixed item, or to the "most recent" in buildscripts or updatesites, and because it has a fixed structure (no timestamps!) could be easily derived by automation workflows from a release number. |
@akurtakov what do you think? Right now we are not creating milestones repositories. This would require us to create milestone repos. |
AFAICS, it's about using the release repo not milestones. I'm fine with doing it that way as long as manual work gets less. |
yes We will need to generate milestone repos and add them to the composite of the release repo. I think this can be done. I don't think we should revive milestones repo. but we should generate individual miletone repositories and add them to release repo. |
That's much like what happens for https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2023-03/ where we accumulate each M*, RC*, and R repository, we point only to the most recent one from the composite, and then we delete all but the release repository at the end of the release cycle. |
@merks can you maybe give some advice or help to archive this? I think M3 is probably to late but maybe we can start this with RC1 (should be this week?). |
So many of these "maintain a composite" are a bunch shell script glue and everyone has variants thereof... For SimRel the following effectively copies the staging repo to a repo nested in the appropriate releases folder: https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/view/Releng%20jobs/job/simrel.releng.promoteToReleases/ It also prepares the composites jars but with a different name which is then used to make the new repository visible at the correct date and time: https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/view/Releng%20jobs/job/simrel.releng.makeVisible/ I think all the job configurations are visible in you're logged in. Lots of scripts here: https://git.eclipse.org/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.tools.git/tree/ I make no claims that these are pretty or ideal... I'm much happier using the reusable JustJ tools mechanism but I don't think that would be easy to apply to the platform's existing and more complex update site structure... |
Please take a look at
|
With the discussion here:
and the first steps to automate most of the "opening" process e.g. here
I noticed that there is actual a little gap in the process regarding the update repository. As noted by @sravanlakkimsetti here, it is usually filled only 5 days before the release and the stream is opened before that.
As this is used to decide what is the "base", this means our builds and verifications running for a while against an possibly outdated baseline if versions are already increased for the next stream.
My proposal therefore would be to fill the repo (e.g in this case
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.27/
) with the content of the M+RC builds as soon as they are available and not open the stream before the RC1 is published. Then as suggested by @iloveeclipse it would later on even be possible to open the stream after M3.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: