Release under libre license

[throwaway1037]

All software files should be released under a free software license and all other files should be released under a libre license.

[Omnikron13]

I believe it already is, though not super well advertised upfront on/by github:

vim-easymotion/doc/easymotion.txt

Lines 1165 to 1190 in b3cfab2

	==============================================================================
	License *easymotion-license*
	License: MIT license
	Copyright (c) 2014-2016 Kim Silkebækken, haya14busa
	Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
	of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
	in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
	to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
	copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
	furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
	The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
	copies or substantial portions of the Software.
	THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
	IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
	FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
	AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
	LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
	OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
	SOFTWARE.
	==============================================================================

Perhaps you could open a pull request adding a LICENCE file and/or note in the readme? ;)

---

(This part is totally an aside, but I don't really wanna leave this unaddressed...

All software files should be released under a free software license and all other files should be released under a libre license.

I don't believe you intended to be rude, or impolite, or whatever the exact words for it would be, bur I humbly ask you to take thought before making comments like this. As it happens, I think you and the dev seem on a similar wavelength actually, but we do have differences of opinions to one degree or another on these matters a lot of the time, and to come onto somebody's project and start preaching for your interpretations and making demands can seem quite, well, insulting, to be blunt.

Asking is more than fine. Suggesting a LICENCE file in the root of the repo would be ideal. But you gotta ask yourself before making proclamations... What have I put out today? When did I last troubleshoot, or bug report, or push?
Maybe it's 'tone policing', but I think we could do with being a tad less brusk with the evangelism sometimes... )