You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If job Y is waiting on job X (AFTER=X) but job X (ID=X) does not generate a cronstamp (because it's not scheduled via FREQ, but via the "classic" fields), then job Y is never executed.
This is undocumented behaviour (and IMHO counter-intuitive). All jobs named with an ID should probably generate a cronstamp, regardless of the syntax with which they are scheduled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should my job on line 2 be running here? I think it follows the workaround you describe, but I'm still not getting any new cronstamps for it. I guess I could combine them into one job with an &&, but that just wouldn't feel right to me.
If job Y is waiting on job X (
AFTER=X
) but job X (ID=X
) does not generate a cronstamp (because it's not scheduled viaFREQ
, but via the "classic" fields), then job Y is never executed.This is undocumented behaviour (and IMHO counter-intuitive). All jobs named with an ID should probably generate a cronstamp, regardless of the syntax with which they are scheduled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: