-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees benchmarks have regressed #67958
Comments
I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label. |
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc Issue Details
Reporting System links:
For Other two benchmarks were most likely regressed by a single change. It could have been #65675 (cc @AndyAyersMS) but also #64688 (cc @mangod9) Repro: git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_monthly.py net7.0-preview2 net7.0-preview3 --filter BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees* BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_5.RunBench
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_6.RunBench
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_2.RunBench
|
Attribute these GC related regressions to the decommit behavior for regions that's being tracked; #73592 & updated the milestone. |
Closing in lieu of #73592 with the latest Net 8.0 results. |
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_2.RunBench
,BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_5.RunBench
andBenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_6.RunBench
have regressed across multiple configurations.Reporting System links:
For
BinaryTrees_5
looks like there was more than one regression:Other two benchmarks were most likely regressed by a single change.
It could have been #65675 (cc @AndyAyersMS) but also #64688 (cc @mangod9)
Repro:
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_5.RunBench
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_6.RunBench
BenchmarksGame.BinaryTrees_2.RunBench
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: