Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wasm] SIMD support tracking issue #51709

Closed
radekdoulik opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

[wasm] SIMD support tracking issue #51709

radekdoulik opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@radekdoulik
Copy link
Member

Context: https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md

Currently still not implemented in Safari. Many engines have implementation available as experimental feature, disabled by default. For example in Firefox it can be enabled in about:config by setting javascript.options.wasm_simd to true.

Emscripten support exists https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/simd.html. Can be enabled with -msimd128. SSE emulation also exists.

Possible future performance gains in Json #41097

@radekdoulik radekdoulik added the arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture label Apr 22, 2021
@radekdoulik radekdoulik added this to the Future milestone Apr 22, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 22, 2021

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Context: https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md

Currently still not implemented in Safari. Many engines have implementation available as experimental feature, disabled by default. For example in Firefox it can be enabled in about:config by setting javascript.options.wasm_simd to true.

Emscripten support exists https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/simd.html. Can be enabled with -msimd128. SSE emulation also exists.

Possible future performance gains in Json #41097

Author: radekdoulik
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm

Milestone: Future

@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Apr 22, 2021
@radekdoulik radekdoulik added area-Interop-mono and removed untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Apr 22, 2021
@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

tannergooding commented Apr 22, 2021

I feel this should be area-System.Runtime.Intrinsics.

While there are certainly internal optimizations possible for the Mono LLVM backend, the WASM SIMD support is very similar in principle to the x64 and ARM64 hardware intrinsics and so likely deserves the dedicated API surface (presumably under System.Runtime.Intrinsics.Wasm) and integration with System.Numerics.Vector<T> and friends.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 27, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-runtime-intrinsics
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Context: https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/master/proposals/simd/SIMD.md

Currently still not implemented in Safari. Many engines have implementation available as experimental feature, disabled by default. For example in Firefox it can be enabled in about:config by setting javascript.options.wasm_simd to true.

Emscripten support exists https://emscripten.org/docs/porting/simd.html. Can be enabled with -msimd128. SSE emulation also exists.

Possible future performance gains in Json #41097

Author: radekdoulik
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm, area-System.Runtime.Intrinsics, area-Codegen-Intrinsics-mono

Milestone: 8.0.0

@lewing lewing closed this as completed Jul 21, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants