Skip to content

Follow up work items for extension operators #79136

@AlekseyTs

Description

@AlekseyTs

The issue is created to track a follow up for the following PROTOTYPE comments:

Binder_Operators.cs(168):// PROTOTYPE: If this result is bad, we might want to stick with bad non-extension result as we do for static extensions below.
Binder_Operators.cs(172):// PROTOTYPE: Add test coverage for the choice between two bad results
Binder_Operators.cs(3123):// PROTOTYPE: If this result is bad, we might want to stick with bad non-extension result as we do for static extensions below.
Binder_Operators.cs(3127):// PROTOTYPE: Add test coverage for the choice between two bad results
Binder_Operators.cs(3651):continue; // PROTOTYPE: Test this code path for actually interesting scenarios around RefKind which have an observable effect vs. just an optimization.
Binder_Operators.cs(3663):continue; // PROTOTYPE: Add test coverage for this code path

The comments in source code now reference this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions