Skip to content

Conversation

@michellemcdaniel
Copy link

No description provided.

This change moves all of the docker images to the latest tag as part of #10377.
@michellemcdaniel
Copy link
Author

michellemcdaniel commented Nov 3, 2022

Please note: this is still broken on the centos 7 image. I don't know why and i haven't been able to figure out how to run the tests locally or in a way that I can debug the failure. The diff of the files between the image previously used and this one is here: https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet-buildtools-prereqs-docker/compare/3e800f15050c4514ee36c7bebffed95cd8dad287..6124dd8d705e266effaffcbb5eca10d9278df8d2#diff-ed6a3ef6bd766531bc5a2c02a93521cf1527017f893a3423b72dbba4501098bd. I could use some help from the diagnostics folks on how to dig into this. The big changes that I can see is moving lldb from 3.9.1 to 9.0, and doing some of the build of llvm/lldb in a scl shell.

This appears to be the error message:

STDIN: 00:00.235: runcommand process launch -s
00:00.236: (lldb) runcommand process launch -s
00:00.271: error: process launch failed: 'A' packet returned an error: 8

@mikem8361
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if this is the seccomp profile (CAP_SYS_PTRACE) that allows ptrace on the new image (if that is possible I don't know). @hoyosjs might.

@mikem8361 mikem8361 closed this Apr 17, 2023
@mikem8361 mikem8361 deleted the use-latest-docker-images-main branch September 15, 2023 17:02
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants