Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2020. It is now read-only.

[CppCodeGen] Enable conservative GC #2033

Open
jkotas opened this issue Oct 16, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

[CppCodeGen] Enable conservative GC #2033

jkotas opened this issue Oct 16, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@jkotas
Copy link
Member

jkotas commented Oct 16, 2016

Remove artificially high GC budget for CppCodeGen and make conservative GC stack scanning work.

@imkow
Copy link

imkow commented Mar 1, 2017

Can Boehm GC be an option?

@jkotas
Copy link
Member Author

jkotas commented Mar 1, 2017

Plugging in a Boehm GC is likely to be more work than enabling the conservative GC scanning for the GC that we have.

@imkow
Copy link

imkow commented Mar 1, 2017

@jkotas Great that you already have a GC that can enable conservative GC.

@jfrancisco-neto
Copy link

So ... any update ?

@forestbat
Copy link

forestbat commented Mar 21, 2019

So ... any update ?

I think maintainers of corert should update their readme and issues,otherwise we don't know how the project going on,however,what we all know is,corert is still in ALPHA.
When will it become release?Maybe three years or longer.

@MichalStrehovsky
Copy link
Member

The CppCodegen code generation backend of CoreRT is currently in a community supported mode. The reasons for that are explained here. We (Microsoft) do provide guidance, code reviews, and accept pull requests for it because we recognize the value of it for the .NET ecosystem, but we're not actively paid to work on CppCodegen for reasons explained in the linked comment.

CppCodegen is making progress, but we don't have timelines or shipping dates. E.g. in January, a Samsung employee contributed reflection support for CppCodegen (#6700).

The RyuJIT code generation backend (that generates native code for supported processors, as opposed to portable C++) in CoreRT is much more complete at this point.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants