-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
<commit-ish> parsing does not recognize @ as HEAD #702
Comments
Likewise |
This would have regressed when we switched from using libgit2 to our own managed git implementation. If @GlebChili decides to add support for any or all of these syntaxes in https://github.com/GlebChili/ManagedGitLib, that would be a good reason to consider switching from our private implementation to that one. |
Perhaps not so trivially:
I guess the response-file feature comes from System.CommandLine. It does not seem very valuable for nbgv, though. |
(Incidentally, System.CommandLine 2.0.0-beta2.21617.1 is now available. It has some breaking changes as described in dotnet/command-line-api#1537.) |
I have opened a corresponding issue for ManagedGitLib: GlebChili/ManagedGitLib#6 I will try to implement a full support for the revision specification syntax in question, but I'm not sure how fast can I do it. |
I guess this is somewhat of a duplicate of #572. |
With nbgv 3.4.244+c60a07221c,
nbgv get-version @
claims "rev-parse produced no commit for @", even thoughgit rev-parse @
treats@
as equivalent toHEAD
as documented in git-rev-parse(1).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: