You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"If you have more than 6 data point (i.e. BAM files) comprising your coverage profiles you may wish to consider using the coverage correlation criteria (--cov_corr) instead of or in addition to this absolute error criteria"
Which would be a recommended value to be used? 0.95?
Is it better to combine both or just use cov_corr?
In addition, could you explain a bit how exactly the cov_perc and the cov_corr are calculated?
Thank you very much in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not sure about the best threshold to use. I haven't had a chance to play with data where this filtering is relevant. It really depends on how conservative you want to be. My gut feeling is something a bit more lenient than 0.95 though. Perhaps 0.8???
The median coverage of a bin is the median across all contigs comprising a bin.
cov_corr: Pearson's r between the median coverage of a bin in each sample vs. the coverage of each individual contig.
cov_corr: This is the mean absolute error in coverage between a contig and the median coverage of a bin taken over all samples. For each sample this is given by: abs(coverage_contig - median_coverage_bin) * 100 / median_coverage_bin.
Hi,
I'm using RefineM with my genomes and 24 samples.
In the readme, it is suggested that:
"If you have more than 6 data point (i.e. BAM files) comprising your coverage profiles you may wish to consider using the coverage correlation criteria (--cov_corr) instead of or in addition to this absolute error criteria"
Which would be a recommended value to be used? 0.95?
Is it better to combine both or just use cov_corr?
In addition, could you explain a bit how exactly the cov_perc and the cov_corr are calculated?
Thank you very much in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: