Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

Just use mkimage.sh … #4

Open
ypid opened this issue May 30, 2015 · 7 comments
Open

Just use mkimage.sh … #4

ypid opened this issue May 30, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@ypid
Copy link

ypid commented May 30, 2015

Hi

I just tried to build a debian jessie base image on a i368 system using the mkimage.sh script from docker and it just worked … Is docker-32bit/debian still needed?

@dashohoxha
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know. I have never tried mkimage.sh, I don't even understand how it works.
Did you also build and run a container based on this image?
Maybe it is not needed anymore.

@ypid
Copy link
Author

ypid commented May 30, 2015

Yes. I run apt-get update and apt-get install. I will use this image as base and report back if something does not work on i386. I was using your script initially but since I am now switching all my systems to a locally build base image I also switched the i368 system to mkimage.sh.

mkimage.sh works kind of similar to this repository.

@mcandre
Copy link

mcandre commented May 31, 2015

mkimage and other chroot builders are cool. Yes, docker-32bit is still useful, for people who want 32-bit bases and don't know how to build them.

@jcoffland
Copy link

I found it useful. More straight forward than mkimage.sh for the particular task of creating a 32-bit Debian image, IMO.

@ypid
Copy link
Author

ypid commented Sep 4, 2015

I simpified the the usage of mkimage.sh using GNU Make: https://github.com/ypid/docker-makefile

Just call make build-debian-base-image

Maybe you guys find this useful.

@dashohoxha
Copy link
Contributor

@ypid
Honestly, using a tool to wrap the usage of another tool, in my opinion adds to complexity.
You have a tool X but you have a problem with it. To handle it you use another tool Y, and now you have two problems.
At least it does not help to understand what is going on.

@ypid
Copy link
Author

ypid commented Sep 4, 2015

There is no problem with this tool, but I understand what you mean. I just wanted to mention it. You are right. Your script is dead simple and is probably useful for some people.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants