Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate moving to brendanzab/algebra as a basis for nalgebra #32

Closed
brendanzab opened this issue Nov 16, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Investigate moving to brendanzab/algebra as a basis for nalgebra #32

brendanzab opened this issue Nov 16, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@brendanzab
Copy link
Contributor

brendanzab commented Nov 16, 2014 •
edited by sebcrozet
Loading

We are currently in the process of simplifying the numeric traits in the standard libraries (see rust-lang/rfcs#369). Perhaps we could move to algebra as a basis for nalgebra?
@sebcrozet
Copy link
Member

Yes, I think that's a good idea; fundamental algebraic traits deserve their own crate.

sebcrozet added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2014
@sebcrozet
Use our own traits instead of the deprecated ones.
77348f6 
We might switch to bjz/num-rs eventually (#32), but in the mean time we just re-declare the
deprecrated traits in nalgebra.
@sebcrozet sebcrozet added internals and removed API labels Nov 22, 2014
@milibopp milibopp mentioned this issue Apr 4, 2015
Merged
@sebcrozet sebcrozet changed the title Investigate moving to num-rs as a basis for nalgebra Investigate moving to brendanzab/algebra as a basis for nalgebra Aug 21, 2016
@sebcrozet
Copy link
Member

I started working on that.

This is currently being done in parallel to the improvement of the algebra crate itself.
A few of those traits have been implemented in d29ff53

@brendanzab
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wonder if it will be possible to allow for better integration between cgmath and nalgebra then... even then, perhaps I might consider switching back if I'm happy enough with the end result :)

@sebcrozet sebcrozet mentioned this issue Sep 20, 2016
Closed
sebcrozet added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2017
@sebcrozet
Release v0.11.0.
181e676 
Fix #211, #207, #205, #200, #145, #136, #108, #50, #32
@sebcrozet sebcrozet mentioned this issue Feb 15, 2017
Merged
@sebcrozet
Copy link
Member

sebcrozet commented Feb 15, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Since #218 , we use alga as a basis for nalgebra. Closing this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@brendanzab @sebcrozet