Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bump multi-calendar library #1615

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

fix: bump multi-calendar library #1615

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

kabaros
Copy link
Collaborator

@kabaros kabaros commented Oct 3, 2024

BREAKING CHANGE: multi-calendar hook no longer returns Temporal date - although it's unlikely to affect anyone, it's a breaking change in theory and should be reflected as such.

more context here: dhis2/multi-calendar-dates#75

Implements DHIS2-18131

BREAKING CHANGE: multi-calendar hook no longer returns Temporal date
@kabaros kabaros requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2024 16:32
@kabaros kabaros changed the title fix: bump ui library fix: bump multi-calendar library Oct 3, 2024
@dhis2-bot
Copy link
Contributor

dhis2-bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🚀 Deployed on https://pr-1615--dhis2-ui.netlify.app

@dhis2-bot dhis2-bot temporarily deployed to netlify October 3, 2024 16:36 Inactive
@dhis2-bot dhis2-bot temporarily deployed to netlify October 4, 2024 07:55 Inactive
@kabaros kabaros merged commit 238de1f into alpha Oct 4, 2024
16 checks passed
@kabaros kabaros deleted the update/multi-calendar branch October 4, 2024 08:40
dhis2-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
# [10.0.0-alpha.1](v9.12.0-alpha.4...v10.0.0-alpha.1) (2024-10-04)

### Bug Fixes

* bump multi-calendar library ([#1615](#1615)) ([238de1f](238de1f))

### BREAKING CHANGES

* multi-calendar hook no longer returns Temporal date

* fix: failing test
@dhis2-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 10.0.0-alpha.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants