Ed. Alex Gil
- DH Commons: Review Guidelines
- Institut für Dokumentologie und Editorik: Kriterien für die Besprechung digitaler Editionen, Version 1.0
- Basic Principles for Modernist Networks Peer Review
- Towards a Peer Review of GeoHumanities Projects
- The NINES / NEH Summer Institutes: Evaluating Digital Scholarship
- 18thConnect: Peer Review
- RedHD: Humanidades Digitales – Evaluación
- AHRC: Peer review and evaluation of digital resources for the arts and humanities
- McClurken, Jeffrey. Revised Digital History Review Guidelines
- Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in Art and Architectural History
- Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University (ISAW), “Assessing Research at ISAW” (2012)
- Institute for the Study of the Ancient World New York University (ISAW), “Research at ISAW,”
- ADA Review Process
- UCLA Digital Humanities, “A Student Collaborators’ Bill of Rights,”
- The University of Arizona, “Promoting an Inclusive View of Scholarship,”
- MLA: Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- AHA: Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in History
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Promotion & Tenure Criteria for Assessing Digital Research in the Humanities
- Memorandum From The Emory College Humanities Council Regarding The Evaluation Of Digital Scholarship
- Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship (NINES), “Guidelines for Promotio n and Tenure Committees in Judging Digital Work” (2011)
- School of Art and Design, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), “Promotion and Tenure Process” (2012)
- Closing the Evaluation Gap. Special Issue of JDH. Vol. 1, No. 4 Fall 2012
- Schreibman, Susan, et al. Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Introduction
- Anderson, Steve and Tara McPherson. Engaging Digital Scholarship: Thoughts on Evaluating Multimedia Scholarship
- Rockwell, Geoffrey. On the Evaluation of Digital Media as Scholarship
- Nowviskie, Bethany. Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship
- McGann, Jerome. On Creating a Usable Future
- Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Peer Review, Judgment, and Reading
- Kristine M. Bartanen, “Digital Scholarship and the Tenure and Promotion Process,” The Academic Commons (July 24, 2014)
- Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, et al., “The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics,” Nature 520 (April 23, 2015): 429–31
- Todd Presner, “How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship” (2011)