Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compiler: Patch custom coefficients #2243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

FabioLuporini
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2243 (698d6a8) into master (d566d31) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 92.85%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2243   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.90%   86.91%           
=======================================
  Files         229      229           
  Lines       41568    41573    +5     
  Branches     7666     7665    -1     
=======================================
+ Hits        36126    36133    +7     
+ Misses       4819     4818    -1     
+ Partials      623      622    -1     
Files Coverage Δ
devito/passes/iet/definitions.py 82.85% <100.00%> (+0.74%) ⬆️
tests/test_unexpansion.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
devito/symbolics/extended_sympy.py 96.08% <75.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini force-pushed the fix-custom-coeff-lowering branch from e0cccf2 to 6818a50 Compare October 24, 2023 12:08
@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini force-pushed the fix-custom-coeff-lowering branch from 6818a50 to 698d6a8 Compare October 24, 2023 12:39
Copy link
Contributor

@EdCaunt EdCaunt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini merged commit ae40de0 into master Oct 24, 2023
32 checks passed
@FabioLuporini FabioLuporini deleted the fix-custom-coeff-lowering branch October 24, 2023 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants