bnxt_en: Fix RX consumer index logic in the error path.

In bnxt_rx_pkt(), the RX buffers are expected to complete in order.
If the RX consumer index indicates an out of order buffer completion,
it means we are hitting a hardware bug and the driver will abort all
remaining RX packets and reset the RX ring.  The RX consumer index
that we pass to bnxt_discard_rx() is not correct.  We should be
passing the current index (tmp_raw_cons) instead of the old index
(raw_cons).  This bug can cause us to be at the wrong index when
trying to abort the next RX packet.  It can crash like this:

 #0 [ffff9bbcdf5c39a8] machine_kexec at ffffffff9b05e007
 #1 [ffff9bbcdf5c3a00] __crash_kexec at ffffffff9b111232
 #2 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ad0] panic at ffffffff9b07d61e
 #3 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b50] oops_end at ffffffff9b030978
 #4 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b78] no_context at ffffffff9b06aaf0
 #5 [ffff9bbcdf5c3bd8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06ae2e
 #6 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c28] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06af24
 #7 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c38] __do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06b67e
 #8 [ffff9bbcdf5c3cb0] do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06bb12
 #9 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ce0] page_fault at ffffffff9bc015c5
    [exception RIP: bnxt_rx_pkt+237]
    RIP: ffffffffc0259cdd  RSP: ffff9bbcdf5c3d98  RFLAGS: 00010213
    RAX: 000000005dd8097f  RBX: ffff9ba4cb11b7e0  RCX: ffffa923cf6e9000
    RDX: 0000000000000fff  RSI: 0000000000000627  RDI: 0000000000001000
    RBP: ffff9bbcdf5c3e60   R8: 0000000000420003   R9: 000000000000020d
    R10: ffffa923cf6ec138  R11: ffff9bbcdf5c3e83  R12: ffff9ba4d6f928c0
    R13: ffff9ba4cac28080  R14: ffff9ba4cb11b7f0  R15: ffff9ba4d5a30000
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018

Fixes: a1b0e4e ("bnxt_en: Improve RX consumer index validity check.")
Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Author: Michael Chan

drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c

@@ -1732,14 +1732,16 @@ static int bnxt_rx_pkt(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
 
 	cons = rxcmp->rx_cmp_opaque;
 	if (unlikely(cons != rxr->rx_next_cons)) {
-		int rc1 = bnxt_discard_rx(bp, cpr, raw_cons, rxcmp);
+		int rc1 = bnxt_discard_rx(bp, cpr, &tmp_raw_cons, rxcmp);
 
 		/* 0xffff is forced error, don't print it */
 		if (rxr->rx_next_cons != 0xffff)
 			netdev_warn(bp->dev, "RX cons %x != expected cons %x\n",
 				    cons, rxr->rx_next_cons);
 		bnxt_sched_reset(bp, rxr);
-		return rc1;
+		if (rc1)
+			return rc1;
+		goto next_rx_no_prod_no_len;
 	}
 	rx_buf = &rxr->rx_buf_ring[cons];
 	data = rx_buf->data;