mptcp: pm: only decrement add_addr_accepted for MPJ req

Adding the following warning ...

  WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)

... before decrementing the add_addr_accepted counter helped to find a
bug when running the "remove single subflow" subtest from the
mptcp_join.sh selftest.

Removing a 'subflow' endpoint will first trigger a RM_ADDR, then the
subflow closure. Before this patch, and upon the reception of the
RM_ADDR, the other peer will then try to decrement this
add_addr_accepted. That's not correct because the attached subflows have
not been created upon the reception of an ADD_ADDR.

A way to solve that is to decrement the counter only if the attached
subflow was an MP_JOIN to a remote id that was not 0, and initiated by
the host receiving the RM_ADDR.

Fixes: d0876b2 ("mptcp: add the incoming RM_ADDR support")
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

Author: matttbe

net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c

@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 			mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
 			spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 
-			removed = true;
+			removed |= subflow->request_join;
 			if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW)
 				__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
 		}
@@ -843,7 +843,11 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		if (!mptcp_pm_is_kernel(msk))
 			continue;
 
-		if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
+		if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR && rm_id &&
+		    !WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.add_addr_accepted == 0)) {
+			/* Note: if the subflow has been closed before, this
+			 * add_addr_accepted counter will not be decremented.
+			 */
 			msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
 			WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
 		}