-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Build the box using docker-machine instead of packer #25
Comments
Hello @lmakarov ! It seems a great idea, since it will make more accessible the box process (packer need some learnings, and maybe it's "too much" for this box). Could you try to open a Pull Request, and let's study code together ? (PS : It seems you can also add a MAINTAINER file à the root of the repo, and write down your name inside with mine :) ) |
You guys are geniuses. 👍 |
Hi all, Do you know what is the status of this feature? I want to create a custom Vagrant Box that will contain some Docker Images inside. I already tested using I saw that you use Packer, it is possible to do this using Packer? |
@ehernandez-xk we eventually switched to docker-machine and maintain our own version of the box @dduportal will know more about doing things with Packer. |
@lmakarov Thank you for your idea. Your project works perfectly. Thank you guys |
I decided to try building the boot2docker-vagrant base box with docker-machine instead of packer.
I'm basically creating a copy of a docker-machine provisioned VirtualBox VM.
This approach shortens the gap between boot2docker-vagrant and docker-machine:
Take a look - https://github.com/lmakarov/boot2docker-vagrant-box/tree/docker-machine
Passes all your tests ;)
Let me know what you think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: