Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Researcher Profile MVP feedback with PARSEC members #310

Closed
kjgarza opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Researcher Profile MVP feedback with PARSEC members #310

kjgarza opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kjgarza
Copy link
Contributor

kjgarza commented Feb 13, 2020

I think I am ready to close the Researcher Profile MVP feedback with PARSEC members.

We have feedback from 4 PARSEC members and only one of them didn't answer open questions.

In terms of the Researcher Profile UI I think our users would be somewhat satisfied (see response Q7).

Issues that came out:

  • Hovers, legends and tooltips are still the more salient requirement in the charts. Ej:

The colour coding of the resource type is not useful without a key as to the colours.

  • The Fabrica language ("DOIs", "Settings", "Findable") is confusing for users. Ej:

Name it the Researcher Profile DOI List - 'DOI's' Mean nothing (or am I missing something?)

  • Similarly, the counters need more context with regards to what they represent. Ej:

an explanation is needed to what is counted as a citation, a view, and a download: what does 'total reported' mean

The full results of the installation survey are in https://de.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-BMGBKV7T7/

@kjgarza kjgarza self-assigned this Feb 13, 2020
@kjgarza kjgarza closed this as completed Feb 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant